Attila
(A.D. 406–453), also known as Attila the Hun
, was the Emperor of the Huns from 434 until his death in 453. He was leader of the Hunnic Empire which stretched from Germany to the Ural River and from the River Danube to the Baltic Sea (see map below). During his rule, he was one of the most fearsome of the Western and Eastern Roman Empires' enemies: he invaded the Balkans twice and marched through Gaul (modern France) as far as Orleans before being defeated at the Battle of Chalons. He refrained from attacking either Constantinople or Rome. His story, that the Sword of Attila had come to his hand by miraculous means, was reported by the Roman Priscus.
In much of Western Europe, he is remembered as the epitome of cruelty and rapacity. In contrast, some histories and chronicles describe him as a great and noble king, and he plays major roles in three Norse sagas: Atlakviða
; Völsunga
; and Atlamál
.
|
ATTILA TICKETS
|
Background
The
Huns
were a group of nomadic tribal people who, appearing from beyond the
Volga, migrated into Europe c.AD 370 and built up an enormous empire in
Europe. Their main military technique was
mounted archery. They were possibly the descendants of the
Xiongnu who
had been northern neighbours of
China three hundred years before
[1] and may be the first expansion of
Turkic people across
Eurasia [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. The origin and
language of the Huns has been the subject of debate for centuries. The leading current theory is that their leaders at least may have spoken a
Turkic language.
Shared kingship
The death of
Rugila (also known as Rua or Ruga) in 434 left his nephews Attila and
Bleda (also known as Buda), the sons of his brother
Mundzuk (
Hungarian:
Bendegúz
,
Turkish:
Boncuk
), in control over all the united Hun tribes. At the time of their accession, the Huns were
bargaining with Byzantine emperor
Theodosius II's envoys over the return of several
renegades (possibly Hunnic nobles not in agreement with the brothers' leadership) who had taken refuge within the
Byzantine Empire. The following year Attila and Bleda met with the imperial legation at Margus (present-day
Požarevac) and, all seated on horseback in the Hunnic manner,
[7] negotiated a successful
treaty: the Romans agreed not only to return the fugitives, but also to double their previous tribute of 350 Roman pounds (ca. 115 kg) of gold, open their markets to Hunnish traders, and pay a ransom of eight
solidi
for each Roman taken prisoner by the Huns. The Huns, satisfied with the treaty, decamped from the empire and returned to their home in the Hungarian Great Plain, perhaps to consolidate and strengthen their empire. Theodosius used this opportunity to strengthen the
walls of Constantinople, building the city's first
sea wall, and to build up his border defenses along the
Danube.
The Huns remained out of Roman sight for the next few years as a Hunnic force invaded the
Sassanid Empire. A defeat in
Armenia by the Sassanids caused them to abandon this attempt and return their attentions to Europe. In 440 they reappeared in force on the borders of the Roman Empire, attacking the merchants at the market on the north bank of the Danube that had been established by the treaty. Crossing the Danube, they laid waste to
Illyrian cities and forts on the river, among them, according to
Priscus,
Viminacium, which was a city of the
Moesians in Illyria. Their advance began at Margus, for when the Romans discussed handing over the offending bishop, he slipped away secretly to the Huns and betrayed the city to them.
As the Huns conquered the Danube defences, the
Vandals, under the leadership of
Geiseric, captured the Western Roman province of Africa with its capital of
Carthage in 440 and the
Sassanid Shah Yazdegerd II invaded
Armenia in 441. Stripping the Balkan defenses of forces requested by the West Romans, in order to launch an attack on the Vandals in Africa (which was the richest province of the Western empire and a main source of the food supply of Rome) left Attila and Bleda a clear path through Illyria into the Balkans, which they invaded in 441. The Hunnish army, having sacked Margus and Viminacium, took
Singidunum (modern
Belgrade) and
Sirmium before halting. A lull followed in 442 and during this time Theodosius recalled his troops from
Sicily and ordered a large new issue of coins to finance operations against the Huns. Having made these preparations, he thought it safe to refuse the Hunnish kings' demands.
Attila responded with a
campaign in 443.
[8] Striking along the Danube, the Huns overran the military centres of
Ratiara and successfully besieged Naissus (modern
Niš) with
battering rams and rolling siege towers—military sophistication that was new to the Hun repertoire—then pushing along the
Nisava River they took Serdica (
Sofia), Philippopolis (
Plovdiv), and
Arcadiopolis. They encountered and destroyed the Roman army outside Constantinople and were stopped by the double walls of the Eastern capital. A second army was defeated near Callipolis (modern Gallipoli) and Theodosius, now without any armed forces to respond, admitting defeat, sent the court official Anatolius to negotiate peace terms, which were harsher than the previous treaty: the Emperor agreed to hand over 6,000 Roman pounds (ca. 2000 kg) of gold as punishment for having disobeyed the terms of the treaty during the invasion; the yearly tribute was tripled, rising to 2,100 Roman pounds (ca. 700 kg) in gold; and the ransom for each Roman prisoner rose to 12
solidi
.
Their demands met for a time, the Hun kings withdrew into the interior of their empire. According to
Jordanes (following
Priscus), sometime during the peace following the Huns' withdrawal from Byzantium (probably around 445), Bleda died (killed in a hunting accident arranged by his brother, according to the classical sources), Attila took the throne for himself, and became the sole ruler of the Huns.
[9]
Sole ruler
thumb's painting
The Feast of Attila
, based on a fragment of
Priscus
In 447 Attila again rode south into the
Eastern Roman Empire through
Moesia. The
Roman army under the
Gothic magister militum
Arnegisclus met him in the
Battle of the Utus and was defeated, though not without inflicting heavy losses. The Huns were left unopposed and rampaged through the Balkans as far as
Thermopylae. Constantinople itself was saved by the intervention of the prefect
Flavius Constantinus who organized the reconstruction of the walls that had been previously damaged by earthquakes, and, in some places, to construct a new line of fortification in front of the old. An account of this invasion survives:
The barbarian nation of the Huns, which was in Thrace, became so great that more than a hundred cities were captured and Constantinople almost came into danger and most men fled from it. … And there were so many murders and blood-lettings that the dead could not be numbered. Ay, for they took captive the churches and monasteries and slew the monks and maidens in great numbers. |Callinicus, in his Life of Saint Hypatius
In the west
In 450 Attila proclaimed his intent to attack the powerful
Visigoth kingdom of
Toulouse, making an
alliance with Emperor
Valentinian III in order to do so. He had previously been on good terms with the Western Roman Empire and its
de facto
ruler
Flavius Aëtius. Aëtius had spent a brief
exile among the Huns in 433, and the troops Attila provided against the
Goths and
Bagaudae had helped earn him the largely honorary title of
magister militum
in the west. The gifts and diplomatic efforts of
Geiseric, who opposed and feared the Visigoths, may also have influenced Attila's plans.
However Valentinian's sister was
Honoria, who, in order to escape her forced betrothal to a
Roman senator, had sent the Hunnish king a plea for help – and her
engagement ring – in the spring of 450. Though Honoria may not have intended a proposal of marriage, Attila chose to interpret her message as such. He accepted, asking for half of the western Empire as
dowry. When Valentinian discovered the plan, only the influence of his mother
Galla Placidia convinced him to exile, rather than kill, Honoria. He also wrote to Attila strenuously denying the legitimacy of the supposed marriage proposal. Attila, not convinced, sent an emissary to
Ravenna to proclaim that Honoria was innocent, that the proposal had been legitimate, and that he would come to claim what was rightfully his.
Attila interfered in a succession struggle after the death of a Frankish ruler. Attila
supported the elder son, while Aëtius supported the younger.
[10] Attila gathered his
vassals—
Gepids,
Ostrogoths,
Rugians,
Scirians,
Heruls,
Thuringians,
Alans,
Burgundians, among others and began his march west. In 451 he arrived in
Belgica with an army exaggerated by Jordanes to half a million strong.
J.B. Bury believes that Attila's intent, by the time he marched west, was to extend his kingdom – already the strongest on the continent – across
Gaul to the
Atlantic Ocean.
[11]
On April 7, he captured
Metz. Other cities attacked can be determined by the
hagiographic vitae
written to commemorate their bishops:
Nicasius was slaughtered before the altar of his church in
Rheims;
Servatus is alleged to have saved
Tongeren with his prayers, as Saint
Genevieve is to have saved
Paris.
[12] Lupus, bishop of
Troyes, is also credited with saving his city by meeting Attila in person.
[13]
Aëtius moved to oppose Attila, gathering troops from among the
Franks, the
Burgundians, and the
Celts. A mission by
Avitus, and Attila's continued westward advance, convinced the Visigoth king
Theodoric I (Theodorid) to ally with the Romans. The combined armies reached
Orleans ahead of Attila,
[14] thus checking and turning back the Hunnish advance. Aëtius gave chase and caught the Huns at a place usually assumed to be near Catalaunum (modern
Châlons-en-Champagne). The two armies clashed in the
Battle of Chalons, whose outcome is commonly considered to be a
Pyrrhic victory for the Visigothic-Roman alliance. Theodoric was killed in the fighting and Aëtius failed to press his advantage, according to Edward Gibbon and Edward Creasy because he feared the consequences of an overwhelming Visigothic triumph as much as he did a defeat. From Aëtius' point of view, the best outcome was what occurred: Theodoric died, Attila was in retreat and disarray, and the Romans had the benefit of appearing victorious.
Invasion of Italy and death
Attila returned in 452 to claim his marriage to Honoria anew, invading and ravaging
Italy along the way. The city of
Venice was founded as a result of these attacks when the residents fled to small islands in the
Venetian Lagoon. His army sacked numerous cities and razed
Aquileia completely, leaving no trace of it behind. Legend has it he built a castle on top of a hill north of
Aquileia to watch the city burn, thus founding the town of
Udine, where the castle can still be found. Aëtius, who lacked the strength to offer battle, managed to harass and slow Attila's advance with only a shadow force. Attila finally halted at the
River Po. By this point disease may have broken out in Attila's camp, thus helping to stop his invasion.
At the wish of Emperor
Valentinian III,
Pope Leo I, accompanied by the
Consul Avienus and the
Prefect Trigetius, met Attila at
Mincio in the vicinity of
Mantua, and obtained from him the promise that he would withdraw from Italy and negotiate peace with the emperor.
[15] Prosper of Aquitaine gives a short, reliable description of the historic meeting. The later anonymous account,
[16] a pious "fable which has been represented by the pencil of
Raphael and the chisel of
Algardi" (as
Gibbon called it) says that the Pope, aided by
Saint Peter and
Saint Paul, convinced him to turn away from the city, promising Attila that if he left in peace, one of his successors would receive a
holy crown.
[17] Priscus reports that superstitious fear of the fate of
Alaric—who died shortly after sacking Rome in 410—gave him pause.
After Attila left Italy and returned to his palace across the Danube, he planned to strike at Constantinople again and reclaim the tribute which Marcian had cut off. (Marcian was the successor of Theodosius and had ceased paying tribute in late 450 while Attila was occupied in the west; multiple invasions by the Huns and others had left the Balkans with little to plunder.) However Attila died in the early months of 453. The conventional account, from
Priscus, says that at a feast celebrating his latest marriage to the beautiful and young
Ildico (if uncorrupted, the name suggests a
Gothic origin)
[18] he suffered a severe
nosebleed and choked to death in a stupor. An alternative theory is that he succumbed to
internal bleeding after heavy drinking or a condition called
esophageal varices, where a
hemorrhoid in the lower part of the
esophagus ruptures leaving the person to choke on his/her own blood.
[19]
Another account of his death, first recorded 80 years after the events by the Roman chronicler
Count Marcellinus, reports that "Attila, King of the Huns and ravager of the provinces of Europe, was pierced by the hand and blade of his wife."
[20] The
Volsunga saga
and the
Poetic Edda
also claim that King Atli (Attila) died at the hands of his wife,
Gudrun.
[21] Most scholars reject these accounts as no more than hearsay, preferring instead the account given by Attila's contemporary Priscus. Priscus' version, however, has recently come under renewed scrutiny by Michael A. Babcock.
[22] Based on detailed
philological analysis, Babcock concludes that the account of natural death, given by
Priscus, was an ecclesiastical "cover story" and that
Emperor Marcian (who ruled the Eastern Roman Empire from 450-457) was the political force behind Attila's death.
Jordanes says: "The greatest of all warriors should be mourned with no feminine lamentations and with no tears, but with the blood of men." His horsemen galloped in circles around the silken tent where Attila lay in state, singing in his
dirge, according to
Cassiodorus and Jordanes: "Who can rate this as death, when none believes it calls for vengeance?"
Then they celebrated a
strava
(lamentation) over his burial place with great feasting. Legend says that he was laid to rest in a triple coffin made of gold, silver, and iron, along with some of the spoils of his conquests. His men diverted a section of the river
Tisza, buried the coffin under the riverbed, and then were killed to keep the exact location a secret.
His sons
Ellac (his appointed successor),
Dengizich, and
Ernakh fought over the division of his legacy, specifically which vassal kings would belong to which brother. As a consequence they were divided, defeated and scattered the following year in the
Battle of Nedao by the
Ostrogoths and the
Gepids under
Ardaric. According to Jordanes, Ardaric, who was once Attila's most prized chieftain, turned against the feuding brothers when he felt that they were treating the nations they ruled as slaves.
Attila's many children and relatives are known by name and some even by deeds, but soon valid genealogical sources all but dry up and there seems to be no verifiable way to trace Attila's descendants. This hasn't stopped many genealogists from attempting to reconstruct a
valid line of descent for various medieval rulers. One of the most credible claims has been that of the khans of
Bulgaria (see
Nominalia of the Bulgarian khans). A popular, but ultimately unconfirmed, attempt tries to relate Attila to
Charlemagne.
Appearance, character, and name
There is no surviving first-person account of Attila's appearance. There is, however, a possible second-hand source, provided by
Jordanes, who claimed
Priscus described Attila as:
Short of stature, with a broad chest and a large head; his eyes were small, his beard thin and sprinkled with grey; and he had a flat nose and tanned skin, showing evidence of his origin.
[23]
thumb
Attila is known in Western history and tradition as the grim
flagellum dei
(Latin: "Scourge of God"), and his name has become a
byword for cruelty and
barbarism. Some of this may have arisen from confusion between him and later
steppe warlords such as
Genghis Khan and
Timur (Tamerlane). All are considered to be cruel, clever, and blood-thirsty lovers of battle and pillage. The reality of his character is probably more complex. The Huns of Attila's era had been mingling with Roman civilization for some time, largely through the Germanic
foederati
of the border, so that by the time of Theodosius's embassy in 448 Priscus could identify two primary languages among the Huns,
Gothic and
Hunnic, with some people knowing
Latin and
Greek. Priscus also recounts his meeting with an eastern Roman captive who had so fully
assimilated into the Huns' way of life that he had no desire to return to his former country, and the Byzantine historian's description of Attila's humility and simplicity is unambiguous in its admiration.
The origin of Attila's name is not known with confidence. The etymology "oceanic (universal) [ruler]" has been proposed, supposing that the Hunnic language was Danube-Bulgarian.
[24]
Alternatively the word might originate from
Turkic Atyl/Atal/Atil/Itil
meaning water, river (also, ancient name of
Volga river), with adjective suffix -ly. (Compare also Turkic medieval notable title
atalyk
– "senior as father").
[25] [26] [27] The Polish Chronicle represents Attila's name as
Aquila
derived from the
Latin aqua
. Others believe that the name may have connection to Hungarian
ítélet
meaning
judgement
. Old-Turkic might have loaned the word
atta
("father") to Goths (or
Gepid) who then added the diminutive suffix
-ila
.
[28] 'Attila' has many variants: Atli and Atle in Norse, Ætla, Attle and Atlee in English, Attila/Atilla/Etele in
Hungarian (all the three name variants are used in
Hungary; Attila is the most popular variant), Etzel in the
German Nibelungenlied, or Attila, Atila or Atilla in modern
Turkish.
Literary and cultural representations
Attila has been portrayed in various ways, sometimes as a noble ruler, sometimes as a cruel barbarian. In Hungary and in Turkey "Attila" is commonly used as a male first name. In Turkey sometimes the name is spelt with double ll rather than double tt (Atilla).
Historiography
- Babcock, Michael A. (2005) The Night Attila Died: Solving the Murder of Attila the Hun
(Berkley Publishing Group, ISBN 0-425-20272-0)
- Blockley, R.C. (1983) The Fragmentary Classicising Historians of the Later Roman Empire
, vol. II (ISBN 0-905205-15-4). This is a collection of fragments from Priscus, Olympiodorus, and others, with original text and translation.
- Gordon, C. D. (1960) The Age of Attila: Fifth-century Byzantium and the Barbarians
(Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, ISBN 0472061119). This is a translated collection, with commentary and annotation, of ancient writings on the subject, including Priscus.
- Heather, Peter (2005) The Fall of the Roman Empire—A New History of Rome and the Barbarians
(Oxford University Press, ISBN 0195159543)
- Howarth, Patrick (1994) Attila, King of the Huns: The Man and the Myth
(ISBN 0786709308).
- Maenchen-Helfen, J. Otto (1973) The World of the Huns: Studies in Their History and Culture
(Berkeley, University of California Press, ISBN 0520015967)
- Man, John (2005) Attila: The Barbarian King Who Challenged Rome
(Bantam Press, ISBN 0-593-05291-9)
- Thompson, E. A. (1948) A History of Attila and the Huns
(London, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0837176409). This is the authoritative English work on the subject. It was reprinted in 1999 as The Huns
in the Peoples of Europe
series (ISBN 0-631-21443-7). Thompson did not enter controversies over Hunnic origins and considers his victories to have been achieved only when there was no concerted opposition. Attila collected tribute from Rome while when he left being hostage as a child vowed to return as a conquer
Epic poetry
- The German epic poem Nibelungenlied
portrays Etzel as a noble and generous ally, while Atli in the Volsunga Saga
and the Poetic Edda
(as well as Ætla in Widsith) is a cruel miser.
Historical fiction
- Hungarian poet János Arany wrote an epic poem about Attila and his brother Bleda called Buda halála
(The Death of King Buda) which is part of a larger work titled A Csaba-trilógia
(The Csaba Trilogy).
- Burgess, Anthony. This British writer wrote a biographical novella about Attila entitled Hun
which was published in the story collection The Devil's Mode
(1989).
- Costain, Thomas. (1959) The Darkness and Dawn
is written from the point of view of Nicolan, carried into slavery from his home on the Danube and after many adventures becoming Attila's aide – but also becoming romantically involved with the beautiful Ildico, which is quite dangerous.
- Dahn, Felix. (1834-1912), historical novel, 1939, Full-Text online (German)
- Dietrich, William. (2005) The Scourge of God: A Novel of the Roman Empire
(HarperTorch, ISBN 978-0060735081) Set in the final days of the Roman Empire, Dietrich's fifth novel follows the attempt of Attila the Hun to conquer the West.
- Ford, Michael Curtis (2005) The Sword of Attila: A Novel of the Last Years of Rome
St. Martin's ISBN 978-0312939151.
- Hungarian Géza Gárdonyi's novel A láthatatlan ember
(1901) (published in English as Slave of the Huns
and largely based on Priscus) offered a sympathetic portrait of Attila as a wise and beloved leader. This reflects the positive way in which Attila, his last wife Ildikó and his brother Bleda are viewed in Hungary and Turkey.
- The Death of Attila
by Cecelia Holland (1973) takes place in 453, with the tensions and uncertainty of Attila's last year being the background for an unlikely friendship between Tacs, a young, ne'er-do-well Hunnish warrior, and Dietric, son of a Germanic subject king.
- Napier, William. Attila is a powerful and charismatic figure in William Napier's ongoing trilogy, Attila
- *Attila
(Orion Books Ltd, 2005, ISBN 0-7528-7787-9).
- *The Gathering of the Storm
(Orion Books Ltd, 2007, ISBN 978-0-75287-433-3)
- *''Attila: Judgement (2008).
- Paty, Little. (2003) Secret of Attila
is a fictional account of the fall of the Huns based on the lives of Attila's offspring.
- Seredy, Kate wrote the novel The White Stag
, the Newbery Medal winning book of 1938, which is a retelling of the legend of the rise of Attila the Hun written in lyric prose.
Other fiction
- Count Dracula in Bram Stoker's novel Dracula
claims to be descended from Attila: "What devil or what witch was ever so great as Attila, whose blood is in these veins?"
[29]
- R.K. Narayan's Malgudi Days
has a chapter on a mongrel dog named after Attila, King of the Huns.
Film and television
- Anthony Quinn played the title role in Attila
, a 1954 Franco-Italian film, co-starring Sophia Loren as Honoria.
- Attila was portrayed by Jack Palance in Douglas Sirk's
(1954).
- A TV miniseries, Attila
, which was produced in 2000 and was broadcast in 2001, stars Gerard Butler as Attila and Powers Boothe as Flavius Aëtius.
- Patrick Gallagher played Attila in the 2006 movie Night at the Museum
, as a misunderstood and abused man looking for someone to reach out to. In the film he appears to be of Asian ancestry, having more in common with the Mongols. Gallagher reprised the role in the 2009 sequel, Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian
.
- Monty Python in one episode, presented a parody of a sitcom entitled, The Attila the Hun Show!
and later an animated Attila the Bun Show
.
- Attila the Hun appeared in an episode of Johnny Test
, who was brought by Johnny and Dukey to help the weakest hockey team, The Porkbelly Ice Pigs, along with a caveman, vikings, a Mongolian warrior, and a knight.
- In the movie "Lionheart", Jean-Claude Van Damme's final opponent is a huge fighter named Attila, who is played by Abdel Qissi. Attila is not only a large fighter, he is known for first toying with his opponents, then tearing them apart ruthlessly.
- In the episode Kif Gets Knocked Up a Notch
of Futurama
, Attila was one of several simulations of evil characters accidentally brought to life (others included Jack the Ripper and Professor Moriarty).
Music
- In 1812 Beethoven intended to compose an opera about Attila and approached August von Kotzebue to write the libretto. This plan was, however, never implemented.
- In 1846 Giuseppe Verdi did compose an opera, Attila
, based on the play Attila, König der Hunnen
("Attila, King of the Huns") by Zacharias Werner.
- In 2004, American heavy-metal group Iced Earth released the album The Glorious Burden which chronicled American military history. Despite the American focus, the album featured a track entitled "Attila", which glorified the Hunnic leader's encounters with the Roman Empire.
- In 2007, British heavy metal band Saxon brought out their seventeenth album The Inner Sanctum, on which features the track "Atila the Hun", a song that acclaims how Atilla almost destroyed the Roman Empire.
Toys
- In June 2004 McFarlane Toys released action figure of Attila, series of "McFarlane's Monsters III: 6 Faces of Madness
" and recommended for mature collectors.
Games
- In Age of Empires 2: The Conquerors expansion, Attila the Hun was a campaign hero.
- In the game The Dig(LucasArts) the asteroid is named Attila after the leader of the Huns.
- Atilla appears on Rome Total War Barbarian invasion on the historical battle of Chalons.
Honors
In
Hungary, several public places are named after Attila; for instance, in
Budapest there are 10 Attila Streets and an Attila Lane, one of which is an important street behind the
Buda Castle.
In Turkey many military operations were named after Attila. When the Turkish army interfered in Cyprus in 1974 the operation was nick named Attila as well. Turks also named hundreds of streets and regions after his name in different cities and towns across Turkey.
References
- Histoire générale des Huns, des Turcs, des Mongols et des autres Tartares
- ''Transylvania through the age of migrations''
- Calise, J.M.P. (2002). 'Pictish Sourcebook: Documents of Medieval Legend and Dark Age History'. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. p279, ISBN 0313322953
- Peckham, D. Paulston, C. B. (1998). Linguistic Minorities in Central and Eastern Europe. Clevedon, UK : Multilingual Matters. p100, ISBN 1853594164
- Canfield, R.L. (1991). Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p49, ISBN 0521522919
- Frazee, C.A. (2002). Two Thousand Years Ago: The World at the Time of Jesus. Wm. B. Eerdmans
- Attila, King of the Huns
- Military Commanders
- Priscus of Panium: fragments from the Embassy to Attila
- The location and identity of these kings is not known and subject to conjecture.
- J.B. Bury, ''The Invasion of Europe by the Barbarians'', lecture IX (e-text)
- The ''vitae'' are summarized in Thomas Hodgkin, ''Italy and Her Invaders'' (New York: Russell & Russell, 1967 reprint of the original 1880–89 edition), volume II pp. 128ff.
- St. Lupus – Saints & Angels – Catholic Online
- Later accounts of the battle site the Huns either already within the city or in the midst of storming it when the Roman-Visigoth army arrived; Jordanes mentions no such thing. See Bury, ibid.
- {{ws|"Pope St. Leo I (the Great)" in the 1913 ''Catholic Encyclopedia''}}
- Medieval Sourcebook, Leo I and Attila
- Chronicon Pictum, this is the first occasion when an artist presented an angel graphically
- Thompson, The Huns, p. 164.
- Attila
- Marcellinus Comes, ''Chronicon'' (e-text), quoted in Hector Munro Chadwick: ''The Heroic Age'' (London, Cambridge University Press, 1926), p. 39 n. 1.
- ''Volsunga Saga'', Chapter 39; ''Poetic Edda'', Atlamol En Grönlenzku, The Greenland Ballad of Atli
- Babcock, Michael A. ''The Night Attila Died: Solving the Murder of Attila the Hun'', Berkley Books, 2005 ISBN 0-425-20272-0
- The Goths by Jordanes. Translated by Charles Gaius Mierow. Chapter 35: Attila the Hun. http://www.romansonline.com/Src_Frame.asp?DocID=Gth_Goth_35
- Hunnic names of the Attila clan
- "Europe: The Origins of the Huns", by Kessler Associate, based on conversations with Kemal Cemal, Turkey, 2002
- ''The World of the Huns. Chapter IX. Language – O. Maenchen-Helfen''
- ''Gene Expression''
- The World of the Huns
- ''Dracula'' by Bram Stoker, 1897, Ch. 3, para. 5